翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Patrick ・ R v Peacock ・ R v Pearson; Ex parte Sipka ・ R v Penguin Books Ltd ・ R v Perka ・ R v Peverett ・ R v Plant ・ R v Powley ・ R v Prince ・ R v Pritchard ・ R v Prosper ・ R v Quick ・ R v Rahey ・ R v Reed ・ R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal ・ R v Richards ・ R v Richardson ・ R v Rodgers ・ R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd ・ R v Ruzic ・ R v Ryan ・ R v S (RD) ・ R v Saibene ・ R v Sansregret ・ R v Saskatchewan Wheat Pool ・ R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) ・ R v Savage ・ R v Schoombie ・ R v Schoonwinkel ・ R v Seaboyer Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Richards ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Richards ''Regina v Richards'', () 1 Q.B. 776, was an English case decided by the Queen's Bench that held that an accomplice to an assault cannot be convicted of a more serious offense than the principal even if the accomplice had the mens rea necessary for the more serious offense.〔Bonnie, R.J. et al. ''Criminal Law, Second Edition.'' Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2004, p. 705〕 ==Factual background== Defendant Richards hired Bryant and Squires to beat up her husband severely enough to put him in the hospital for a month. When the defendant's husband was leaving work, Richards gave a signal to Bryant and Squires, who assaulted the victim in an alley. The injuries were not as serious as anticipated and the victim did not require hospitalization. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Richards」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.